We think as
No security promises.
Design-only entities.
We study identity, boundaries, and data paths to design controls where they are needed: in the session, in authorizations, in encryption, and in execution.
ARCHITECTURE / DEFENSE IN DEPTH
Every level is a boundary to overcome.
Our bunker is a layered architecture: distinct controls on identity, permissions, and execution. Vault encryption protects selected sensitive documents.
Security isn't just claimed.
System Surface
AUTH-01 Authentication Level Verifiable Cryptographic Identity KEY-BASED
Asymmetric key pairs per session. No passwords stored, no shared secrets. RSA-OAEP handshake at every connection.RBAC-02 RBAC Governance Permissions validated at runtime ACTIVE
Role-based capability model. Every action is verified against signed policies. Deny-by-default, no implicit permissions.VAULT-03 Vault Encryption Core Selective client-side encryption AES-256-GCM
Authenticated encryption at rest. Keys never leave the client boundary; the server stores ciphertext it cannot read.HYDRA-04 Hydra Sync Engine Signed event propagation EVENT-DRIVEN
No polling. State propagates only via signed and ordered events — replay and reordering are rejected by design.EXEC-05 Client Execution Model On-device sovereign execution LOCAL-FIRST
Computation runs on-device. Sensitive logic never touches a server that could be compromised or coerced.GATE-06 Gateway JS Loader Encrypted form delivery CIFRATO
No raw script delivery. Modules are decrypted and verified in memory before execution.CORE-07 Compiled Go Runtime Single binary, no interpreter COMPILED
The backend is a single compiled Go binary: no interpreters to tamper with, no source code executable on the server, and no runtime dependencies. Memory-safe by design and tamper-proof, with zero technical debt from dynamic languages.Vault encryption applies to selected sensitive documents. Operational data, authorizations, and services maintain distinct controls within the system.
Enforcement Engine
Five controls enforced at runtime, not documented on paper.
Security Signals
Illustrative diagram of control areas: this is not a real-time reading of the infrastructure.
| Signal | Events | Status |
|---|---|---|
| AUTH EVENTS | Identità e contesto della sessione | AUTH |
| VAULT ACCESS | Documenti cifrati e destinatari autorizzati | VAULT |
| SYNC EVENTS | Flusso e coerenza degli aggiornamenti | HYDRA |
| ROLE CHANGES | Ruoli, capability e autorizzazioni | RBAC |
| CRYPTO OPERATIONS | Cifratura e gestione delle chiavi | CRYPTO |
Threat Model Analysis
The model links attack scenarios to the controls to be examined. Verifying a vulnerability requires evidence from the analyzed system.
Attack Surface Reduction
What we removed matters more than what we added.
Failure Model
Designed to fail safely. Every compromise has a boundary.
Containment depends on the point of compromise and the keys or authorizations involved. These scenarios guide the system analysis.
If it can be fixed later,
was poorly designed.
Security Review Request
We don't sell penetration tests. We analyze system architecture at its deepest level.
If your system assumes trust,
is already compromised by design.